|
| Wikileaks: Security Risk or Transparency At Last? |
| Written by Guy de Beaumarché |
| Tuesday, 27 July 2010 02:30 |
![]() Governments have always been extremely secretive about their military operations, and usually it is with good reason. The safety of the troops and the mission requires those in the armed forces to keep tight-lipped about what’s going on the ground. But what if the secrecy was in place to cover up military mistakes and agendas that are condemned by the rest of the world? Today, the website Wikileaks released about ninety thousand pieces of documents that revealed sensitive military operations conducted by the United States of America in Afghanistan during the past 6 years. To be fair, the documents were from the time before President Barack Obama’s new strategy for Afghanistan. Is this move by Wikileaks a strike to international stability and security or is it a victory for those seeking more transparency and accountability in an illegal war (illegal because Congress never officially declared war)? (Photo: adactio) |
Comments
Unlike what others might bring up on national security of disclosing military confidential information, most things disclosed aren't exactly current, in the sense that it is not on the location of Osama Bin Laden while the trooped are mobilizing and heading over this minute. Rather, it provides an "over-the-fence" look on what was going on.
We need more of it.
RSS feed for comments to this post